Attain your mind.

Wikileaks leaked video of Civilians killed in Baghdad. Unbelievable!

  If you haven't seen this video already then here it is.  Wikileaks obtained and decrypted this previously unreleased video footage from a US Apache helicopter in 2007. It shows people who were assumed to be insurgents but turned out to be Reuters journalist Namir Noor-Eldeen 22 (whose camera was mistaken for a weapon), driver Saeed Chmagh 40, and several others, shot and killed in a public square in Eastern Baghdad. After the initial shooting, an unarmed group of adults and children in a minivan arrives on the scene in an attempt to transport the wounded. They are fired upon as well, over and over until no one is moving. The official statement of the military did not reveal how the Reuters staff were killed, and stated that they did not know how the children were injured.   Near the end of the video, they spot a guy with an AK-47 that goes into a building,  then asked permission to put a missile in that building.  Two seconds before they shoot the first missile, you'll see an innocent pedestrian walking on the sidewalk in front of the building clearly in view.  They still decided to shoot without making another pass, killing the pedestrian as you hear the solider say "Nice shot".

Wikileaks released this video with transcripts and a package of supporting documents on April 5th 2010 at http://collateralmurder.com

Most importantly, listen to the soldiers comment as if they were playing a video game, hooting and hollering with every kill.  It's as if they have no respect for human life.  I understand that soldiers got to have a different mindset when engaging in battle in order to get the job done.  But the comments you'll hear in this video go beyond what you could imagine.  Unreal!  

Now you know who videoed missions in Iraq are classified.

For a little back ground, Namir was a well-known and talented photographer that was recruited by the US based Reuters news agency for his knowledge of the area and being in a position of trust with so-called insurgents.  He also had the reputation for being quick onto the scene, creating irritation for the occupying forces. Saeed had been employed as his driver and fixer.

  After demands by Reuters, the incident was investigated and the U.S. military concluded that the actions of the soldiers were in accordance with the law of armed conflict and its own "Rules of Engagement".  Local Iraqi police reported the deaths as a result of a "random American bombardment" while the US Army said they had died during a gunfight with insurgents. There was confusion among local witnesses because nobody had seen any insurgents in the area on that day and few people had any idea to what was going on.

Reuters demanded access to the Apache helicopter gunships video; Namir's camera's and copies of the written testimony of all who were present. When examining the camera the digital card was still inside.  The pictures showed no sign insurgents, no battle activity, no dead or wounded and no panic anywhere. 

"Both Namir and Saeed were among three journalists killed that week, a third, unnamed man working as a translator had been killed in the same week bringing the total deaths of Reuters employees to five since the invasion in 2003. Two other Reuters men, a Palestinian and a Ukrainian had also been killed by US Troops. In every case, US military spokesmen had insisted that they had acted lawfully."  source

About 15 people were murdered by the US military, among them were two children and two journalists who all were considered collateral damage. What really should be making you think is the fact that this is only one morning in Iraq and just one of thousands of classified videos.  Is this really the everyday experience over there?

Terrorism - 
      "The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons."   thefreedictionary.com

So I ask who the terrorists really are? The Iraqi people are getting their neighborhoods blown to pieces and innocent people are being killed daily, including children, all in the name of "Democracy and the Fight Against Terrorism".

Isn't it acts like this that's destroying humanity?  Can you now understand the hatred towards America? 

This next video is Soldier Ethan McCord and his eyewitness story about the video above and his experiences as a solider in Iraq.  "This type of thing happens every day".  Listen and learn to what's really going on over there.

I leave you with a few snapshots from the leaked video.

I feel so much sorrow for the innocent people in the Middle East who are effected by this war.  The rules of engagement seem to have been thrown out the window.  Try to imagine if this was your neighborhood, and it was your friends and family considered as collateral damage.  What would you think of the people and their government after your child or parent was killed because of an itchy trigger finger.  I have no idea what it's like to live in that world, and I'm thankful for that, you should be too. Attain you mind.

The Global Warming Conspiracy

     First off, let me just say that I do believe that humans in the last 100 years have played a huge roll in climate change.

Here are a list of reason to how humans contribute to climate change every day.

"-Electricity is the main source of power in urban areas. All our gadgets run on electricity generated mainly from thermal power plants. These thermal power plants are run on fossil fuels (mostly coal) and are responsible for the emission of huge amounts of greenhouse gases and other pollutants.

- Cars, buses, and trucks are the principal ways by which goods and people are transported in most of our cities. These are run mainly on petrol or diesel, both fossil fuels.

- We generate large quantities of waste in the form of plastics that remain in the environment for many years and cause damage.

- We use a huge quantity of paper in our work at schools and in offices. Have we ever thought about the number of trees that we use in a day?

- Timber is used in large quantities for construction of houses, which means that large areas of forest have to be cut down.

- A growing population has meant more and more mouths to feed. Because the land area available for agriculture is limited (and in fact, is actually shrinking as a result of ecological degradation!), high-yielding varieties of crop are being grown to increase the agricultural output from a given area of land. However, such high-yielding varieties of crops require large quantities of fertilizers; and more fertilizer means more emissions of nitrous oxide, both from the field into which it is put and the fertilizer industry that makes it. Pollution also results from the run-off of fertilizer into water bodies."

This is really just the tip of the iceberg without having to write a book about it.  But my post is about the conspiracy of  the "Global Warming Movement" which is different from the climate change due to global warming.

There's a big problem I have with this global warming movement which is: the powers behind the global warming movement are making billions of dollars.  The new carbon credit tax is going to generate TRILLIONS of dollars every year.  So now the Oil companies for example have to pay to pollute.  These carbon credits in no way prevent less carbon emissions, they simply just have to be paid for.  The thought is that because companies have to pay more money in order to produce whatever it is that their producing that they will produce less.  You tell me what's wrong here.  Companies will simply figure out a new business model in order to keep production high.  Do you really think that Oil, Coal and mineral producers (the largest contributors to carbon emissions) are going to cut back on production??  Think again.  I'm sure that the amount of oil, coal, or whatever product that is being produced out weights the extra cost of carbon credits. So why would any of these giants cut back on production?  They won't because less production equals less money.

I have proof.  For example, I live in Salt Lake City Utah, which during the winter months has the worst quality in the entire United States. They say children that grow up here can never reach full lung capability because of the amount of pollution in the air.  The largest copper mind in the world that can be seen from space is also located here called Kennecott.

Here is a statement from their website.

"Air quality

Thanks to its unique topography and quickly growing population, Utah experiences a number of challenges in maintaining healthy air quality for its citizens, particularly in the more densely populated areas along the Wasatch Front. Kennecott Utah Copper is keenly aware of these issues and the impacts the company has on air quality, and is working hard to reduce harmful impacts on Utah’s air quality.  Kennecott Utah Copper has an ongoing commitment to build sustainable development into all its business decisions and is focused on helping maintain clean air quality for Utah."

Kennecott mine is the fourth largest polluter in the United States and contributes to more than 60% of the air pollution in the Salt Lake Valley. And guess what their next move is. That's right, expansion. The plan is to push back one of the walls 1000 feet and deepen the massive open pit about 300 feet in order to reach 700 tons of ore resource.  So this future expansion is helping air quality how?

Now here's what really boils my noodle, the fact that so called "Green Companies" can sell their unused carbon credits.  By selling these credits it simply allows the big polluter to pollute more making up for the "Green Company" that didn't pollute as much.  So were in this equation I ask are there less carbon emissions?  NO WHERE!!!  The whole thing stinks to high heaven just like the emissions coming from the smoke stacks.

Lets take a look at who was responsible for starting the "Global Warming" movement and it's not Al Gore, this man goes by the name Maurice Strong. Strong made his first fortune in oil, yep that's right oil. In the 1950s he took over a small natural gas company, Ajax Petroleum, and built it into what became one of the leading companies in the industry, Norcen Resources.  He then when on to be the president of the "Power Corporation of Canada" until 1966. In the early 70s he became the Secretary-General of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment and became the first Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Program. He later returned to Canada to become Chief Executive Officer of Petro-Canada then went on head Ontario Hydro, one of North Americas largest power utilities. He also became the national President and Chairman of the Extension Committee of the World Alliance of YMCAs, and headed American Water Development Incorporated. He served as a commissioner of the World Commission on Environment and Development in 1986 and is recognized by the International Union for Conservation of Nature as a leader in the international environmental movement.  Today, Strong is President of the Council of the United Nation's University for Peace.

As Chairman of American Water Development Incorporated, Strong instituted a program to pump underground water and send it to the suburban areas of Denver, Colorado Springs, and Pueblo. Townspeople of nearby Crestone, Colorado created a grass-roots movement against the business project. The project was opposed by the Colorado Division of Wildlife and National Park Service, both claiming it would cause significant environmental damages to nearby wetland and sand dune ecosystems.  After a lengthy trial, Colorado courts ruled against AWDI and required payment of the objectors' legal fees, $3.1 million. 

In 1971, Strong commissioned the world's first "state of the environment" report entitled “Only One Earth: The Care and Maintenance of a Small Planet” The report summarized the findings of 152 leading experts from 58 countries in preparation for the first UN meeting on the environment, held in Stockholm in 1972. This was the beginning of the "Global Warming Movement" and established the environment as part of an international development agenda.

Strong was one of the commissioners of the World Commission on Environment and Development, set up as an independent body by the United Nations in 1983 and started the what is known as the "Earth Summit" which soon established the Earth Council and he continued to take a leading role in the agreements at the Earth Summit, implementing the Earth Charter movement, his Chairmanship of the World Resources Institute, Membership on the Board of the International Institute for Sustainable Development, the Stockholm Environment Institute, The Africa-America Institute, the Institute of Ecology in Indonesia, the Beijer Institute of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, and others. Strong was a longtime Foundation Director of the World Economic Forum, a Senior Adviser to the President of the World Bank, a Member of the International Advisory of Toyota Motor Corporation, the Advisory Council for the Center for International Development of Harvard University, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, the World Conservation Union (IUCN), the World Wildlife Fund, Resources for the Future, and the Eisenhower Fellowships. 

Seriously, this guy is out to rule the world, literally and this is the man who started the "Global Warming Movement".

Just one more bit to his back ground if your not tired already. In 2005, during investigations into the U.N.'s Oil-for-Food Program, evidence was found by federal investigators that while working for Annan, Strong endorsed a check for $988,885, made out to "Mr. M. Strong," issued by a Jordanian bank. It was reported that the check was hand-delivered to Mr. Strong by a South Korean businessman, Tongsun Park, who was eventually convicted of conspiring to bribe U.N. officials to rig Oil-for-Food in favor of Saddam Hussein. Mr. Strong was never accused of any wrongdoing. During the inquiry, Strong stepped down from his U.N. post, stating that he would "sideline himself until the cloud was removed" and moved to china where he currently resides.

Look at his background; oil, money and global domination are obviously his main goals in life. Try to find any real info on this guy and you can't, he's a ghost.  If you look at his Wikipedia page, you'll notice the editing of the article had been disabled and if you view the page's history it shows about 30 edits on May 12th alone.

 Strong is Al Gore's mentor and silent partner on everything, and was the mind behind the carbon tax project while Gore would be the front man to create the "Global Warming Movement" in order to make people believe this is what we have to do to save the planet. They both stand to make billions and billions of dollars if the carbon tax proposals go through.  Making money off global warming?  Really?? 

One of the "Green" companies Gore invested in called Silver Spring Networks, recently received a contract worth $560 million dollars from the Energy Department to install “smart meters” in people’s homes that record energy usage.

In 2001 Gore's net worth was $2 million, and today he refuses to disclose this information, but to give you an example of the kind of money he's currently making he recently made a single investment of $35 million in Capricorn Investment Group, a private equity fund. A New York Times report notes how Gore “has a stake in the world’s pre-eminent carbon credit trading market.” And before Barack Obama was President he also helped fund the profiteers of the carbon taxation program that he is now seeking to implement as law. Is Gore really out to save the earth by cutting emissions? Well,  Gore’s own mansion uses 20 times the energy of the average American home. In February 2007, the Tennessee Center for Policy Research revealed that the gas and electric bills for Gore's 20-room home and pool house devoured nearly 221,000 kilowatt-hours in 2006, more than 20 times the national average of 10,656 kilowatt-hours. Gore denies nothing.  Wonder if he's going to put one of those "Smart Meters" on his house.

The Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) has direct ties to both Al Gore and Maurice Strong, who are both intimately involved with a long standing movement to use man made global warming as a mechanism for profit and social engineering. Gore’s investment company, Generation Investment Management, which sells carbon offset opportunities, is the largest shareholder of CCX. Strong is also on the board of directors for the CCX.

On a final note I leave you with that fact that both Strong and Gore are members of the Club of Rome, who in their 1991 Report, “The First Global Revolution” openly admitted how they were planning to exploit global warming in order to further their agenda.

If you want to see an entertaining video on the subject check out Jesse Ventura's conspiracy theory show he made on the subject.

Attain your mind.

What Killed Thousands of Birds and Fish Around the World?

There has been a sudden death of millions of fish and hundreds of thousands of bird's throughout the world in less than a week.

About 5000 red-winged black birds fell dead from the sky in Beebe, Arkansas January 1nd 2011 right after midnight.  100,000 fish wash up on the Arkansas river the very next day.  2 days later, more than 500 blackbirds turned up dead in Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana and dozens of more birds have been reported dead in Gilbertsville, Kentucky. Over 300 dead birds fell from the sky in Alabama.  Brazil, it's reported that one hundred tons of dead catfish, croaker and sardines have washed ashore. In New Zealand hundreds of dead snapper have been found.  Swedish officials are reporting the deaths of dozens of birds. The Baltimore Sun is also reporting the sudden death of 2 million fish in the Chesapeake Bay.  More than 100 birds found dead along highway 101 in California.  Dozens of birds dead in Missouri.  Thousands of dead fish along Chicago's lake front.  In England they reported to find more than 40,000 dead crabs.  Thousands of Turtle Doves fell dead from the sky in Faenza, Italy.  More than 50 birds found dead in Sweden

Many eye witnesses say "It was as if they were committing suicide" slamming themselves into the side of buildings, trees, cars and whatever else was in front of them.

This reminds me of the movie "The Core" where thousands of pigeons slam into buildings and fall from the sky due to the core of the earth stopping its rotation.  What's killing all these birds and fish?  Some say it was fireworks.  Some say sonic booms from a plane. Others think it's from weather anomalies. Others speculate poison.  I've even heard overeating may be the cause.  To top it all off, it's been reported that the animals were bleeding internally as if they were put in a microwave. WTF!

Under the water and in the sky, something very strange happened that killed these animals.  It wasn't the weather, fireworks, sonic booms, poison or overeating. I don't believe this was not a natural phenomenon either.  Whatever killed these animals killed them very quickly as if they were zapped, and I personally believe that's exactly what happened.  But what kind of technology could do such a thing and who the hell was behind the "ON" button?  Try, Electromagnetic Wave Technology or Scalar Wave Technology or both.

Think that's crazy?

Take a look to what happened on radar.

The weather guy explains it all by saying he has no idea what it is.  You tell me.  Here's a professional weather man who is very well trained to read radar telling the reporter it's a complete mystery.  Notice again how the anomaly doesn't move with the rest of the clouds.  Something very strange is going on and it's not the weather.  The dead fish and birds were zapped by some kind of wave frequency.  What else would instantly kill thousands of birds and fish making them bleed from the inside?

"Scalar wavelengths are considered to be finer than gamma rays or X rays and only one hundred millionth of a square centimeter in width.  Unlike other wavelengths, they flow in multiple directions at right angles off electromagnetic waves, as an untapped energy source called 'potentials'.   Potentials are particles which are unorganized in hyperspace - pure etheric energy not manifest in the physical world.  Scalar 'potentials' can be created artificially and when focused into a weapon and can do major damage to an object's location in space-time. That which determines the object's natural pulse of matter and anti-matter cycle can become stressed when targeted by scalar waves made of artificial potentials, because they are almost always absorbed by the nucleus of an atom, not the electrons in orbit. " - Source

Basically frying the atom from the inside out.

Apparently the HAARP has these capabilities and many people believe this was a test of it's power.

The HAARP or High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program is used to analyze the ionosphere and investigate the potential for developing ionospheric enhancement technology for radio communications and surveillance purposes (such as missile detection). It's also used as an ionospheric heater. Many people also believe there are other sinister uses for the HAARP, such as weather manipulation and mind control. Basically this thing blasts billions of watts of power into the ionosphere and heats it up.  In retrospect, nuclear bombs were exploded in high altitude tests in the late fifties and early sixties by both the U.S.S.R. and the U.S. which caused weather and jet stream changes that lasted almost 20 years.

But this isn't the only facility of its kind, other such US facilities are located at Arecibo, Puerto Rico and Fairbanks, Alaska.  Around the world they can be found in Tromso, Norway; Moscow, Nizhny Novgorod and Apatity, Russia; Kharkov, Ukraine and Dushanbe, Tadzhikistan.   There are currently 72 such facilities around the world although none of these systems have the combination of frequency capability and beam steering agility as the HAARP does.

The real question is, what are these faculties really being used for?

"The ionosphere is home to many beneficial natural phenomena among them, filtering the sun's harmful rays and although it's not totally understood, the ionosphere also directly effects the weather systems and the jet streams." - Source
  So why the hell would you want to heat it up?  The powers that be are more interested in experiments then the actual effects they could potentially have on our planet.

So then I ask could this be what killed all the birds and fish in less than a week?  I feel it's a good chance that it is.

 Attain your mind